May 5th, 2023 / µ

Monsters

You will see the term monsters repeatedly if you read my texts. What I mean when I write ‘Monsters’ is the following: a definition I base on my years of experience with a specific gang-stalking group, gaslighting, and related harassment.

By monsters, I mean a specific group of seemingly sociopathic voyeurs who degrade and reduce human beings to objects and entertainment; who seem to revel in humiliating and destroying their human targets, hiding in the shadows, behind desks, and screens; and who demonstrate undisguised contempt for the law, freedom, and human dignity, and whose statements reveal alarming political convictions.

This particular group appears highly dysfunctional, with an extreme echo chamber mentality. They define their own rules, laws, and enemies. Facts are irrelevant. They make up their own reality.
The group has leaders whom they talk about with such awe that it is spine-chilling. These leaders appear to be paranoid, unstable, and physically aggressive, with strong narcissistic and sadistic tendencies.
Judging by their behavior, they could even suffer from an SMI such as schizophrenia. But that is for professionals to conclude.
This group always works together as a group.
Their strength lies in numbers, places of employment, and connections.
They use various setups to gain the trust of private individuals and secure free access to their homes.
They have a vast network that extends into some worrying circles in Denmark and France, and possibly elsewhere as well.

A Danger to Democracy & Freedom?

In 2017, due to these monsters, Social Services caught my attention, and how it works in Denmark, a world I knew little about and had had no contact with, apart from housing benefits (Boligsikring) when I was young.

It was interesting to learn how the so-called welfare system, and especially the SSP*, works in real life, as opposed to the rosy red picture painted by the Danish state. Today, I know a lot more than I would like to.

Today, it seems to me that certain parts of the Danish system nurture and fertilize the conviction that human beings are nothing but numbers, entertainment, and meal tickets.

It also seems to me that the very close collaboration in Denmark between the social services, schools, and police forces, where the same people work together year after year, establish close relationships, and information and, perchance, misinformation flow freely, can endanger the freedom and fundamental civil rights of Danish citizens as well as other individuals residing in Denmark and reinforce the above mentality and certain people’s assumption that violating the rights, freedom, and dignity of Danish citizens and other individuals living in Denmark is their prerogative and privilege.

Lesson Learned

Today, I know that Denmark has a truly sinister and disturbing side to it. Systems of social control, corruption, favors, exploitation, and inequality where monsters can do whatever they want and get away with it because they are part of a system that, in all its self-glorification, relies upon trust and uncontested words instead of proof, fact-checking, and consequences.

Thanks for reading! I hope you found it valuable and worth your time! Until next time, remember to get your facts straight and that whatever good times you have will never come back as bad times,

µ

SSP

SSP stands for Social Services, School, and Police. It is, in effect, a system of surveillance and control. To begin with, it was a collaboration between these three institutions - most likely in violation of the Danish constitution – to help young people under the age of 18.

However, today, it has perverted into a state within the state, and specific people within these groups are so extreme, so insane, so out of touch with reality, that they believe themselves to have the right to surveil, exploit, violate, control, and destroy any Danish citizen or person residing in Denmark at will.

Kontaktrapporter

(Contact Reports)

Writing a report after a meeting, conference, phone call, or any other contact with one or more individuals is standard. There’s nothing wrong with that; that’s standard procedure for most professionals.

However, the kind of reports I am talking about, contact reports (in Danish: Kontaktrapport), are those written by individual Danish public employees about a person, a citizen or non-citizen resident of Denmark, they met with – one one-on-one meeting, phone call, and so on – that are not automatically accessible to the person or persons discussed and defined.

When I first learned that these reports existed, it was through stories about the social services system and the extreme behavior of certain case workers. And I understood that it was the prerogative of Danish public employees to write such uncontested, de facto secret reports; secret, as in kept a secret from the person they describe and discuss.

But I admit it wasn’t until I came across a report written about me by a police officer that I began to think seriously about this and understood that (to my knowledge) any public employee I had come into contact with had the right to write such a subjective, non-contested report about me.

I asked around to see if it was just me who was out of the loop, and whether this system of reporting and public employees evaluating and assessing, e.g., the personality, appearance, lifestyle, and mental state of the people they had spoken with, was common knowledge. It was not common knowledge that an encounter with a public employee could give birth to such a report. The people I asked did not even know that such reports existed.

And that’s because the Danish state prefers to keep public servants’ reports about Danish citizens hidden from the Danish citizens.

Sadly, this secrecy is not surprising. It is more or less standard in Denmark – if it can be hidden, it will be hidden. Obtaining any information from the Danish state, including information about yourself, is a challenging process, often resulting in a stalling process that, if you are persistent and don’t back down, results in them handing you a tiny slice of the cake and indirectly telling you:

That’s it! Now shut up!

Today, I believe that these reports, this system of secrecy and uncontested lies, reveal a problem of such magnitude that it undermines the constitutional state.